Grading Teachers, Grading Schools
Is Student Achievement a Valid Evaluation Measure?
Edited by:
- Jason Millman - Cornell University, USA
August 1997 | 304 pages | Corwin
"A masterful compilation of diverse perspectives."
Daniel L. Stufflebeam, Director, The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University
It's not a question of whether student learning is an important goal of teaching. Everyone agrees it is. The issue explored here is can you (and should you) use student learning as a measurement tool for assessing teacher effectiveness?
This book examines four high-profile, high-stakes, contemporary methods for evaluating teaching through learning gains. It offers a rationale and background for each one along with a discussion on supporting evidence and practical implications.
The chapter authors provide these criteria for judging a teacher valuation system:
* Is this method fair?
* Will this method provide comprehensive data?
* How does this method compare to other methods?
* What are the positive and negative consequences of using this method?
You'll find out how well each method stacks up, how cumbersome or easy it is to use, and what kind of support or heel-dragging to expect from participants.
Measuring teacher effectiveness through student learning can also result in:
* Higher levels of instruction
* Important data for school and program evaluation
* A model for continuous school improvement
* A more accurate picture of what (and how) students are learning
If you're interested in the future of teacher assessment, or if you're ready to make changes in the way your school or district assesses its teachers, you need to read this book.
PART ONE: ORIGINS AND UNDERPINNINGS
Jason Millman and H Del Schalock
Beginnings and Introduction
PART TWO: THE OREGON WORK SAMPLE METHODOLOGY
Bill Cowart and David Myton
Oregon's Teacher Effectiveness Work Sample Methodology
H Del Schalock, Mark Schalock and Gerald Girod
Oregon's Teacher Effectiveness Work Sample as Used at Western Oregon State College
Peter W Airasian
Oregon's Teacher Effectiveness Work Sample Methodology
Daniel L Stufflebeam
Oregon's Teacher Effectiveness Work Sample Methodology
H Del Schalock, Mark Schalock and Gerald Girod
Reflections on Comments by Professors Airasian and Stufflebeam
PART THREE: THE DALLAS VALUE-ADDED ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Luvern L Cunningham
In the Beginning
William J Webster and Robert L Mendro
The Dallas Value-Added Accountability System
Yeow Meng Thum and Anthony S Bryk
Value-Added Productivity Indicators
Gary Sykes
On Trial
William J Webster et al
Little Practical Difference and Pie in the Sky
PART FOUR: THE TENNESSEE VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
Patricia E Ceperley and Kip Reel
The Impetus for Tennessee's Value-Added Assessment System
William L Sanders, Arnold M Saxton and Sandra P Horn
The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System
Richard B Darlington
TVAAS
William L Sanders et al
Response to the Reviewers
PART FIVE: THE KENTUCKY INSTRUCTIONAL RESULTS INFORMATIONS SYSTEM
Doris Redfield and Roger Pankratz
Historical Background
Neal Kingston and Ed Reidy
Ronald K Hambleton
Measurement Quality of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System, 1991-1994
Daniel L Stufflebeam
Overview and Assessment of the Kentucky Instructional Results Informations System
Neal Kingston and Ed Reidy
KIRIS Meets the Critics
PART SIX: SYNTHESIS AND PERSPECTIVES
Jason Millman
How Do I Judge Thee? Let Me Count the Ways
Linda Darling-Hammond
Toward What End?
W James Popham
The Moth and the Flame