Behavioral Science & Policy
Behavioral Science & Policy is a unique peer-reviewed journal that seeks to bridge the divide between behavioral science and practice by facilitating thoughtful application of rigorous empirical social and behavioral science that addresses significant social challenges. BSP publishes research from a broad range of cognitive, social, organizational, and management science disciplines that is currently actionable by policy makers and other practitioners. BSP features a wide variety of topical areas, including (but not limited to) diversity & inclusion, education, energy & the environment, financial decision making, health and health care, happiness and well-being, justice & ethics, management & organizations, poverty & development, and public safety.
BSP seeks content that is concise, accessible, has practical applicability, and exhibits high standards of scientific integrity. Submissions are reviewed by both disciplinary scientists for their rigor and policy/practice experts for their actionability. Professional writing editors work with authors of accepted manuscripts to enhance the accessibility of their work for a broad general audience that includes both specialists and non-specialists. Publications may also be supported by BSP through media promotions, public workshops, and briefings of policy makers and other practitioners.
BSP accepts open submissions in the article categories listed below, sometimes solicits contributions from authors, and circulates open calls for submissions on themed “spotlight” topics.
| Craig R. Fox | UCLA, USA |
| Sim B. Sitkin | Duke University, USA |
| Paul Brest | Stanford University, USA |
| David Brooks | New York Times, USA |
| John Seely Brown | Deloitte |
| Robert B. Cialdini | Arizona State University, USA |
| Carol Graham | Brookings |
| Adam M. Grant | University of Pennsylvania, USA |
| Daniel Kahneman | Princeton University, USA |
| Faisal Naru | Policy Innovation Centre |
| Jeffrey Pfeffer | Stanford University, USA |
| Denise M. Rousseau | Carnegie Mellon University, USA |
| Paul Slovic | University of Oregon, Eugene, USA |
| Cass R. Sunstein | Harvard University, USA |
| Richard H. Thaler | University of Chicago, USA |
| Shlomo Benartzi | UCLA, USA |
| Laura L. Carstensen | Stanford University, USA |
| Susan T. Fiske | Princeton University, USA |
| Chip Heath | Stanford University, USA |
| David I. Laibson | Harvard University, USA |
| George Loewenstein | Carnegie Mellon University, USA |
| Richard E. Nisbett | University of Michigan, USA |
| M. Scott Poole | University of Illinois, USA |
| Eldar Shafir | Princeton University, USA |
| Varun Gauri | Princeton University, USA |
| Henry J. Aaron | Brookings Institution, USA |
| Matthew D. Adler | Duke University, USA |
| Peter Cappelli | University of Pennsylvania, USA |
| Thomas D’Aunno | NYU, USA |
| J.R. DeShazo | UCLA, USA |
| Brian Gill | Mathematica, USA |
| Michal Grinstein-Weiss | Washington University, USA |
| Ross A. Hammond | Brookings Institution, USA |
| Ron Haskins | Brookings Institution, USA |
| Arie Kapteyn | University of Southern California, USA |
| John R. Kimberly | University of Pennsylvania, USA |
| Mark Lubell | UC Davis, USA |
| Timothy H. Profeta | Duke University, USA |
| Donald A. Redelmeier | University of Toronto, Canada |
| Rick K. Wilson | Rice University, USA |
| Kathryn Zeiler | Boston University, USA |
| Dean S. Karlan | Northwestern University |
| Oren Bar-Gill | Harvard University, USA |
| Colin F. Camerer | California Institute of Technology, USA |
| M. Keith Chen | UCLA |
| Julian Jamison | World Bank |
| Russell B. Korobkin | UCLA |
| Devin G. Pope | University of Chicago, USA |
| Jonathan Zinman | Dartmouth College |
| Eric J. Johnson | Columbia University |
| Linda C. Babcock | Carnegie Mellon University, USA |
| Max H. Bazerman | Harvard University, USA |
| Baruch Fischhoff | Carnegie Mellon University, USA |
| John G. Lynch | University of Colorado, USA |
| Ellen Peters | The Ohio State University, USA |
| John D. Sterman | MIT |
| George Wu | University of Chicago, USA |
| Carrie R. Leana | University of Pittsburgh |
| Jone L. Pearce | UC Irvine, USA |
| Stephen R. Barley | Stanford University |
| Rebecca M. Henderson | Harvard University |
| Thomas A. Kochan | MIT |
| Ellen E. Kossek | Purdue University |
| Christopher P. Long | St. John's University, USA |
| Elizabeth W. Morrison | NYU |
| William Ocasio | Northwestern University |
| Sara L. Rynes-Weller | University of Iowa, USA |
| Richard Larrick | Duke University, USA |
| David Grusky | Stanford University |
| Dolores Albarracín | University of Illinois, USA |
| Susan M. Andersen | NYU |
| Thomas N. Bradbury | UCLA |
| John F. Dovidio | Yale University, USA |
| David A. Dunning | Cornell University, USA |
| E. Tory Higgins | Columbia University, USA |
| John M. Levine | University of Pittsburgh, USA |
| Harry T. Reis | University of Rochester, USA |
| Tom R. Tyler | Yale University, USA |
| Peter Hedstrom | Oxford University |
| Arne L. Kalleberg | University of North Carolina |
| James Moody | Duke University, USA |
| Robert J. Sampson | Harvard University, USA |
| Bruce Western | Harvard University, USA |
Manuscript Formats
Manuscripts can be submitted in a number of different formats, each of which must clearly explain specific implications for (public and/or private-sector) policy and/or practice:
Proposals (up to 2,000 words) specify scientifically grounded policy proposals and provide supporting evidence including concise information about relevant studies. This category is most appropriate for describing new policy implications of previously published work or a novel policy recommendation that is supported by new or previously published studies.
Essays (up to 2,000 words) articulate a perspective on applied behavioral science for a general audience. For example, essays may refer to use or application of behavioral insights to policy and practice, ethical considerations, or comment on recent developments in the field.
Reports (up to 3,000 words) provide a summary or overview of a body of recent work by an institution or organization involved in applied behavioral science. This may include an overview of processes, meta-analysis or broad summary of empirical results, and a description of lessons learned.
Findings (up to 3,000 words) report on results of new studies and/or substantially new analysis of previously reported data sets (including formal meta-analysis) and the policy implications of the research findings. This category is most appropriate for presenting new evidence that supports a particular policy recommendation. The additional length this format permits (but does not require) is designed to accommodate a fuller account of methods, results, and/or analysis of studies that have not been previously reported elsewhere (though some finer details may be relegated to supplementary online materials).
Reviews (up to 4,000 words) survey and synthesize the key findings (particularly field studies), recent developments, and policy implications of research in a specific disciplinary area or on a specific policy topic. This could take the form of describing a general-purpose behavioral tool for policy makers or a set of behaviorally grounded insights for addressing a particular policy challenge. Reviews should be presented in a way that provides an easy entry point for the uninitiated and also a good summary of developments for researchers in that area.
Other Published Materials. BSP will sometimes solicit or accept Letters and other formats.
Review and Selection of Manuscripts
Authors may submit full manuscripts or extended abstracts (400-500 words) of a proposed manuscript for evaluation. On submission, the corresponding author is asked to indicate the most relevant disciplinary area and policy area addressed by his/her manuscript (In the case of some Review papers, a “general” policy category designation may be appropriate). The area-specific Senior Disciplinary Editor and the Senior Policy Editor provide an initial screening of the manuscripts. A manuscript that passes initial screening is reviewed by a relevant Associate Policy Editor and a relevant Associate Disciplinary Editor, who serves as the steward of the manuscript as it is moved through the editorial process. The manuscript author will receive an email within approximately two weeks of submission indicating whether the article has been sent to outside referees for further consideration. External review of the manuscript entails evaluation by at least two outside referees. In most cases Authors will receive a response from BSP within approximately 60 days of submission. With rare exception, we will submit manuscripts to no more than two rounds of external review. We generally do not accept re-submissions of material without an explicit invitation from an editor. Professional editors trained in the BSP style will collaborate with the author of any manuscript recommended for publication to enhance the accessibility and appeal of the material to a general audience (i.e., a broad range of behavioral scientists, public- and private-sector policy makers, and educated lay public). We anticipate no more than two rounds of feedback from the professional editors.
Copyright and License
Copyright to all published articles is held jointly by the Behavioral Science & Policy Association and SAGE Publishing, subject to use outlined in the Behavioral Science & Policy publication agreement (a waiver is considered only in cases where one’s employer formally and explicitly prohibits work from being copyrighted; inquiries should be directed to the BSPA office). Following publication, the manuscript author may post the accepted version of the article on his/her personal website, and may circulate the work to colleagues and students for educational and research purposes. We also allow posting in cases where funding agencies explicitly request access to published manuscripts (e.g. NIH requires posting on PubMed Central). No articles may be posted without permission until the conclusion of a brief embargo period to allow for circulation of a press release.
Open Access
BSP posts each accepted article on the SAGE website in an open access format. Questions regarding institutional constraints on open access should be directed to the editorial office.
Promotion
BSP will often work with authors to help promote their work to a broad audience. We do this through coverage in our partner blog, the Behavioral Scientist, through policy briefings and our conferences, and through referral to an agent to place op-ed content in popular media.